香港乒乓網 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: [長膠] 長膠單膠皮有無好介紹 [打印本頁]

作者: iacentre 時間: 2012-7-16 21:39 標題: 長膠單膠皮有無好介紹

国产最低玩有無好介紹

作者: 閃人 時間: 2012-7-16 21:48

陞威,$30.388d-1

作者: Sunny Wise 時間: 2012-7-16 21:51 標題: 回復 2# 的帖子

抱歉，要遲D先返貨

作者: iacentre 時間: 2012-7-16 21:59

引用:

原帖由閃人於 2012-7-16 21:48 發表
陞威,$30.388d-1

Thanks, 比較拍里奥CK531A 如何?

作者: 閃人 時間: 2012-7-16 22:02

引用:

原帖由 iacentre 於 2012-7-16 09:59 PM 發表

Thanks, 比較拍里奥CK531A 如何?

沒有打過,只用過388d-1,Dr.Neubauer Boomerang Classic,TIBHAR GRASS

作者: iacentre 時間: 2012-7-16 22:18

引用:

原帖由閃人於 2012-7-16 22:02 發表

沒有打過,只用過388d-1,Dr.Neubauer Boomerang Classic,TIBHAR GRASS

Thanks, 因為淘寶 Palio CK531A 最低 RMB11 :)

作者: 閃人 時間: 2012-7-16 22:20

引用:

原帖由 iacentre 於 2012-7-16 10:18 PM 發表

Thanks, 因為淘寶 Palio CK531A 最低 RMB11 :)

請問Palio CK531A性能如何 >?

作者: iacentre 時間: 2012-7-16 22:30

引用:

原帖由閃人於 2012-7-16 22:20 發表

請問Palio CK531A性能如何 >?

http://www.tabletennisdb.com/pips/palio-ck531a.html
But I intend to use it on the backside of J-pen (to hit, to cut, to flip ) for "short ball" coming on the table.

作者: monkey330 時間: 2012-7-16 23:24 標題: 回復 8# 的帖子

CK 531A應是半長,攻擊比較好,防守一般

作者: BrianDD 時間: 2012-7-16 23:38

引用:

原帖由 monkey330 於 2012-7-16 23:24 發表
CK 531A應是半長,攻擊比較好,防守一般

CK 531A是長膠
攻守也很好

作者: monkey330 時間: 2012-7-16 23:42 標題: 回復 10# 的帖子

我個人覺得似半長,因為太好攻
守我就覺得一般

作者: BrianDD 時間: 2012-7-16 23:47

引用:

原帖由 monkey330 於 2012-7-16 23:42 發表
我個人覺得似半長,因為太好攻
守我就覺得一般

你覺得
但不是事實

有好多人以為自已用長膠在攻
但其實又慢又冇威力
在香港能說得上用長膠能做出真正攻球的人不多
不出10人

作者: 葉師傅 時間: 2012-7-16 23:49

友誼的837同755,大維的388D-1,拍里奧的CK531A,都相當底玩呢 !

作者: monkey330 時間: 2012-7-16 23:55 標題: 回復 12# 的帖子

師兄教下我

作者: iacentre 時間: 2012-7-17 00:18

引用:

原帖由 葉師傅 於 2012-7-16 23:49 發表
友誼的837同755,大維的388D-1,拍里奧的CK531A,都相當底玩呢 !

It seems 友誼的837同755 not listed in ITTF, but thanks for sharing.

作者: monkey330 時間: 2012-7-17 00:18 標題: 回復 15# 的帖子

點會

作者: BrianDD 時間: 2012-7-17 00:19

引用:

原帖由 monkey330 於 2012-7-16 23:55 發表
師兄教下我

冇得教
長膠之路是要自已行出來的

作者: monkey330 時間: 2012-7-17 00:21 標題: 回復 17# 的帖子

咁搵日切磋下
你同貓哥打,我係一邊偷C

作者: iacentre 時間: 2012-7-17 00:21

引用:

原帖由 monkey330 於 2012-7-17 00:18 發表
點會

but 大維的388D-1 and 拍里奧的CK531A are listed in ITTF.

作者: 葉師傅 時間: 2012-7-17 01:00

引用:

原帖由 iacentre 於 2012-7-17 00:18 發表

It seems 友誼的837同755 not listed in ITTF, but thanks for sharing.

唔好講笑啦 ! 請睇清楚點吧 !

作者: iacentre 時間: 2012-7-17 01:17

引用:

原帖由 葉師傅 於 2012-7-17 01:00 發表

唔好講笑啦 ! 請睇清楚點吧 !

You may name the numbers more precise. Under supplier "Friendship", "002 R.I.T.C 755 - 2" and "Kokutaku 755" are listed, not "229 755" ! right? From the same supplier, there is no "837" attached to it.

作者: hungwahsun 時間: 2012-7-17 07:38

吓我一跳!我正用837.755.刚查过,还有注冊.我用过的大陆胶,个人觉得755,赛拉,savigav较易攻,爱国者,怪客防守较好,388d-1,837较均衡,当然,每人用的底板不同,手感也不同.日前把芳碳磨掉的球拍,贴上赛拉防守也不错了.

作者: `-Wesley 時間: 2012-7-17 07:53

而家用緊c7單膠,想轉番388d-1,因為388d-1真係太邪

作者: wlwlwl 時間: 2012-7-17 09:51

837 & 755 都有ITTF註冊

作者: fundexpo 時間: 2012-7-17 10:07

Interesting! Globe 999T or Palio AMIGO single sheet pip in (inverted) are also listed. Someone has mentioned that no single sheet pip in is allowed unless with sponge.

作者: wlwlwl 時間: 2012-7-17 10:38

引用:

原帖由 fundexpo 於 2012-7-17 10:07 發表
Interesting! Globe 999T or Palio AMIGO single sheet pip in (inverted) are also listed. Someone has mentioned that no single sheet pip in is allowed unless with sponge.

When rubber sheets are registered on ITTF, the suppliers only need to register the top sheet.
Just think about 狂三, people use all sorts of sponge (yellow, blue, etc) with 狂三, it is impossible and not practical to register the sponge together with top sheets.

FYI, the rules are:
1). pips-out rubber can be used on its own or glued to sponge
2). pips-in rubber must be used with sponge

作者: iacentre 時間: 2012-7-17 10:40

引用:

原帖由 wlwlwl 於 2012-7-17 10:38 發表

When rubber sheets are registered on ITTF, the suppliers only need to register the top sheet.
Just think about 狂三, people use all sorts of sponge (yellow, blue, etc) with 狂三, it is impossible a ...

Very informative, with thanks!

作者: looks 時間: 2012-7-17 10:58

refer to Wesley (而家用緊c7單膠,想轉番388d-1,因為388d-1真係太邪)
C7 兵總好像不准出賽

作者: wlwlwl 時間: 2012-7-17 11:03

引用:

原帖由 looks 於 2012-7-17 10:58 發表
refer to Wesley (而家用緊c7單膠,想轉番388d-1,因為388d-1真係太邪)
C7 兵總好像不准出賽

C7 is registered
you can check it out with this URL: http://www.ittf.com/_front_page/ittf1.asp?category=rubber

作者: looks 時間: 2012-7-17 11:19 標題: about c7

refer to WlWlWl C7 is registerd
  Due to c7  was changed the new paptent , and this new paptent still not yet
register,, so  hktta told me that cannot use  Next time ......  thx
  and the new paptent c7 is located on left side  the  registered one is located on hand  side

作者: looks 時間: 2012-7-17 11:29 標題: re : about c7

c7 新板c7兩字印在左側
and the old one is on right hand side

作者: wlwlwl 時間: 2012-7-17 11:57

引用:

原帖由 looks 於 2012-7-17 11:29 發表
c7 新板c7兩字印在左側
and the old one is on right hand side

You're correct that the old one has "C7" on the left hand side.

as I have a un-used C7 sitting in my drawer.
If HKTTA told you that you can not use C7, then it is their decision.
It is up to you how to deal with this.

Luckily, I am NOT a C7 user

But normally the umpire refers to the LARC document: http://www.ittf.com/stories/pictures/LARC_33.pdf
And there isn't any picture of the "Rubber ID Stamp" on the LARC_33.pdf, so if the umpire base their decision on the LARC33.pdf, I don't think they can disqualify you. This is only my personal opinion and not the HKTTA official statement on the use of C7.

作者: looks 時間: 2012-7-17 12:02

thx for your opinion .

作者: wlwlwl 時間: 2012-7-17 12:07

引用:

原帖由 looks 於 2012-7-17 12:02 發表
thx for your opinion .

Actually, I think HKTTA would be wrong to disqualify the old C7 (where C7 is on the left hand side).
But again, this is my personal opinion (although through this time with sufficient evidence), not official statement from HKTTA.
As clearly stated on the LARC33.pdf in the below paragraph:
-------------------------------------------------------
Many racket coverings contain additional text in the rubber mould apart from the brand name and suppliers name and this does not disqualify them from the LARC. However, the brand name given in the LARC must be there (for example, Butterfly Sriver L and Butterfly Sriver S have the addition “D13”). Such texts could be positioned anywhere in the area reserved for the text on the rubber.
How to acknowledge a racket covering from LARC:
1. Make certain that you have the correct LARC (see date of validity, it is published twice a year, in April and October.
Pdf files to be found on our website at all times: www.ittf.com).
2. The supplier and brand names as well as the ITTF logo and eventually ITTF number should be clearly visible on the rubber.
3. These names should appear in the LARC. If in doubt, check the images/pictures on the ITTF web site.
-------------------------------------------------------
Since DHS and C7 are clearly positioned on the old mold, I believe the old C7 should be okay.

[ 本帖最後由 wlwlwl 於 2012-7-17 12:12 編輯 ]

歡迎光臨香港乒乓網 (http://hkttf.com/)