Board logo

標題: [砌版討論] Little tips to choose a suitable single-ply Hinoki Wood [打印本頁]
作者: iacentre    時間: 2012-2-28 13:26     標題: Little tips to choose a suitable single-ply Hinoki Wood

Here are the little tips to choose a suitable single-ply Hinoki Wood Blade that fits your style.

There are three “good” characteristics of the wood you should be looking for.

1.        Soft, strongest tenacity (韧性), and huge resiliency (弹性) that is better for looping
2.        Hardness, strong tenacity, and great resiliency that is better for blocking, aggressive attacking, and even for looping if choosing suitable rubber.
3.        Medium hardness, moderate tenacity, and good resiliency that is better for all-round.

Hope this help.

[ 本帖最後由 wilson2020 於 2012-5-29 21:36 編輯 ]
作者: feideepking    時間: 2012-2-28 15:23

木曾檜較受歡迎
作者: jcclee    時間: 2012-2-28 15:35     標題: 回復 1# 的帖子

其實單檜的性格暗藏著好多變化,
可惜我只習慣了打橫板, 無緣體驗.

Thanks for your sharing !

Are you always in Canada ?
Have you ever come back to HK and played with the forum's members ?
作者: neku    時間: 2012-2-28 16:30

引用:
原帖由 jcclee 於 2012-2-28 15:35 發表
其實單檜的性格暗藏著好多變化,
可惜我只習慣了打橫板, 無緣體驗.

Thanks for your sharing !

Are you always in Canada ?
Have you ever come back to HK and played with the forum's members ?
打左單檜會覺得橫板同直板都唔夠實在; jcclee 兄其實應該一試, 我見你簽名上玩開既板多數以快為主, 單檜絕對滿足到你 - "爆"
作者: jcclee    時間: 2012-2-28 16:33

引用:
原帖由 neku 於 2012-2-28 16:30 發表


打左單檜會覺得橫板同直板都唔夠實在; jcclee 兄其實應該一試, 我見你簽名上玩開既板多數以快為主, 單檜絕對滿足到你 - "爆"
可能遲d 會都唔定

(你的勁極7 ST 難買得到嗎 ? 原來居然有 ST !)
作者: neku    時間: 2012-2-28 16:56

引用:
原帖由 jcclee 於 2012-2-28 16:33 發表

可能遲d 會都唔定

(你的勁極7 ST 難買得到嗎 ? 原來居然有 ST !)
來吧, 齊中檜毒吧~
(勁7ST 之前收返黎ga 者~ 你想試可以借你玩下)
作者: iacentre    時間: 2012-2-28 18:04     標題: 回復 3# 的帖子

Thanks for the invitation, actually I will be in HK in later of March. It would be wonderful if I can have chance to play with (as well as learn from ) you guy s although I am not very good.  Thanks, p.s. sorry to response  all of you late here for this thread as it is after midnight here.
作者: fundexpo    時間: 2012-2-28 19:41

In case that I have to add a rubber on the back side of this (hinoki) blade, who could suggest any rubber from your experience? with thanks!
作者: iacentre    時間: 2012-3-27 07:25

Ref: Older woods better than Newer woods

I recently acquired Yinhe 1-ply special edition Hinoki wood, which has 11.5mm with 102 grams. it was made before year of 2007 when Yinhe posted their ads (note that they didn’t have thickness for 11.5mm) with following contents.
"银河重要通知：
1．在日本制造(MADE IN JAPAN)的单桧已全面到货，价格如下：
      200#（年轮200年以上）  数量充足>800支   售价880元
      260#（年轮250年以上）  限量    <120支   售价1580元
      350#（年轮350年以上）  极少    < 30支    售价2990元
    厚度：中直(CS)10.5mm、日直(JS)10.5mm、横拍(FL\ST)10.0mm。"

I brought my Yinhe's single-ply Hinoki wood with special edition to “萬 X” for comments. The owner commented it should be “A” grade, he also said he has BTY Cyber Max, and one “supper item – I forgot the model” are AAA. I compared these three together only for “sound test” and “bounce test”. The Cyber Max listed $2600+ and the “supper” listed $3300+ , they are all J-penhold. The Max sound softer than the supper while the Yinhe sounds the brighter and harder than other two. After that I used a ping-pong for bounce test, the Yinhe's was the highest and more frequency rebound than the supper followed by the max, all these tests were also duplicated by a salesperson as well in the shop and he agreed with all these analysis. I could be wrong; it seems the older woods looks better than the newer woods regardless the brand. Just having this personal experience to share to you, and the point I try to make is to look at the quality of wood rather than the brand. Good luck to all single-ply Hinoki wood fans!

[ 本帖最後由 iacentre 於 2012-3-27 09:36 編輯 ]
作者: neku    時間: 2012-3-27 10:45

引用:
原帖由 iacentre 於 2012-3-27 07:25 發表
Ref: Older woods better than Newer woods

I recently acquired Yinhe 1-ply special edition Hinoki wood, which has 11.5mm with 102 grams. it was made before year of 2007 when Yinhe posted their ads (n ...
hope u can well understand my chinese msg
小弟都係新接觸單檜, 現在都掌握了少少經驗, 你所講的應該係Bty 既Cypress Max (但另一塊就估唔到了)
Cypress Max / Kim Taek Soo / RSM G-max 級數應是Bty 中最高的了( 對上當然有特注級數 )
它們的厚度多維持在10-10.5mm之間; 所以以你所擁有的一塊銀河11.5mm作比較, 差別應甚大;
之前爬了不少文, 選購單檜要注重的地方有好多
1.板形(eg:大小拍面, cypress / 韓金 / 蔣澎龍), 因拍面不同, 重心不同
2.重量, 同一板形都有不同的重量, 反映了單檜的密度彈性
木紋/漏油/有無白邊都是較外觀的條件, 但都會有細微的分別;
最後顛球測試, 用來測試手感/ 韌性 / 彈性(睇個人喜好);
我個人而言, 買單檜牌子都好緊要, 我較喜愛bty / Xiom 的單檜:
因為佢地既單檜佢地對檜木既處理比較好;質量平均唔會有超大的差別.資料未必有用, 看過就算

[ 本帖最後由 neku 於 2012-3-27 10:50 編輯 ]



歡迎光臨 香港乒乓網 (http://hkttf.com/) Powered by Discuz! 6.0.0