引用:
原帖由 looks 於 2012-7-17 12:02 發表 
thx for your opinion .
Actually, I think HKTTA would be wrong to disqualify the old C7 (where C7 is on the left hand side).
But again, this is my personal opinion (although through this time with sufficient evidence), not official statement from HKTTA.
As clearly stated on the LARC33.pdf in the below paragraph:
-------------------------------------------------------
Many racket coverings contain additional text in the rubber mould apart from the brand name and suppliers name and this
does not disqualify them from the LARC. However, the brand name given in the LARC must be there (for example, Butterfly Sriver L and Butterfly Sriver S have the addition “D13”).
Such texts could be positioned anywhere in the area reserved for the text on the rubber.
How to acknowledge a racket covering from LARC:
1. Make certain that you have the correct LARC (see date of validity, it is published twice a year, in April and October.
Pdf files to be found on our website at all times:
www.ittf.com).
2.
The supplier and brand names as well as the ITTF logo and eventually ITTF number should be clearly visible on the rubber.
3. These names should appear in the LARC. If in doubt, check the images/pictures on the ITTF web site.
-------------------------------------------------------
Since DHS and C7 are clearly positioned on the old mold, I believe the old C7 should be okay.
[
本帖最後由 wlwlwl 於 2012-7-17 12:12 編輯 ]
